Elsa Raven

Daphney 2022-03-17 08:01:01

The postman always rings twice,
1981+1946, this is a dialogue between black and white, and it should be considered a classic dialogue! (I want to say, the 1981 version is too inferior in comparison!)
The unique delicacy and cleanliness of black and white films, and color is the trend of film...

Declan 2022-03-17 08:01:01

      The 1981 version of The Postman Always Rings the Doorbell Twice was a remake of the 1946 film of the same name, but the 1981 version achieved far less artistic success than the 1946 original. The two stories are told in the same way, and the key plots are handled in the same way. Why is there...

Ceasar 2022-03-25 09:01:23

Not as good as a uturn horse

Collin 2022-03-17 08:01:01

This version looks much better than the 46 version~ Could it be that the low scorers are all diehards of the 46 version? Both the male and female lead and the second male are more suitable for the characters than the 46 version. Two uneducated people, in a country fast food restaurant, seem to be playing the game of gentlemen and ladies in a high-end club in Manhattan? The 46 version of Lana is like a noble lady in the hall, where is she like a boss who does rough work in the kitchen? The 81 version of Jessica performed rough, and the makeup was a bit "old fashioned", which was in line with the image of the working class. As for Nicholson, the performance is much smoother than Garfield's, with a savage and vulgar temperament, which is completely the hero in his mind. The disharmony between the heroine and her husband is also more obvious and tense than the 46 version. The logic of several plot changes is more rigorous, especially when the two failed to escape for the first time, the conflict in the 81st edition is real and credible, and the reason for the 46th edition is very reluctant. In a word, it is still a question of the code. The 46th edition of this black story is particularly subtle and obscure. The 81st edition is completely open, unrestrained, wild and wild, and at the end of the 81st edition, the unnecessary passage of the male protagonist's imprisonment is omitted, and it ends abruptly in the car accident. Not as preachy as the 46th edition.