-
Jennyfer 2022-02-02 08:16:20
Can't write short reviews
It contains so many elements that it is no wonder it is called a "kaleidoscope". Everyone can find what they want from this film. A tale of idealist disillusionment, the revolutionary love depicted in it is pure and passionate, like a cup of boiling water. Not a revolutionary love, but a...
-
Eddie 2022-02-02 08:16:20
"Reds": Struggle for ideals (Best Director at the 54th Academy Awards)
Copyright statement: Please indicate the original source and author information of the article and this statement in the form of a hyperlink when reprinting
http://qfmeng.blogbus.com/logs/189927028.html
Reds (1981)
After reading the IMDB250 and AFI100 series, it is time to watch the Oscar series ....
Christopher Malcolm
-
Rodolfo 2022-03-19 09:01:11
1981 was not such a great year for movies. This one should have won the Oscar for Best Picture. I love Diane Keaton.
-
Deonte 2022-03-25 09:01:23
Regardless of the content, the super-fast speech and super-informative dialogue are enough to attract attention. Politics is ultimately a pain in the ass. "A great cause is ahead, worth living and dying for", "Is he a socialist, many of them are idealists"
-
John Reed: Zinoviev, you don't think a man can be an individual and be true to the collective, or speak for his own country and speak for the International at the same time, or love his wife and still be faithful to the revolution. You don't have a "self" to give.
Grigory Zinoviev: Would you be willing to give yourself to this revolution?
John Reed: You separate a man from what he loves most, what you do is purge what's unique in him. And when you purge what's unique in him, you purge dissent. And when you purge dissent, you kill the revolution! Dissent IS revolution!
-
Louise Bryant: [to Eugene O'Neill] Are you nervous, or is that a tremor?
