-
Celestine 2022-03-23 09:02:49
When human potential is stimulated by rape
I also don't understand why the banned rape scene is still a more subtle follow-up revenge. It's clever and cold-blooded.
After seeing a female writer being raped and insulted, I can't understand her later actions. It's just that she is too bunker. Five men designed a clever killing. Death is a... -
Douglas 2022-03-23 09:02:49
The 1978 version and the 2010 version have their own advantages and disadvantages
The female writer Jennifer went to the country to write, was targeted and raped by a group of idle youths, and the timid Lugis let her go. Before long, Jennifer began her revenge plan. The film was rated R-17 because of sensitive topics and nudity.
Compared with the 2010 edition, the 1978 edition...

Anthony Nichols
-
Jerald 2022-03-15 09:01:05
Many people say that this film is "boring" or even that it is "a banned film with a false name", then you should watch a veritable pornographic film. The story is simple. The process of being gang-raped by a female writer for revenge, but he was still banned, because it is estimated that some middle-class men on the classification review committee would be panicked when they saw this film. They saw that they had slender thighs under their skirts. The woman must have thought to herself secretly, are you waiting for someone to ride?
-
Elinore 2022-03-19 09:01:07
3.5stars. rape-revenge plotline. finding creative ways to revenge. Come on, you have to admit this is not bad.
Related articles
-
Johnny: [to Jennifer after she pulls a gun and tells him to take off his clothes] I don't like women giving me orders.
-
Jennifer Hills: [about to kill Stanley] Suck it, bitch!