The success of "Timeline" novels lies in the exquisite description of a world hundreds of years ago, and the combination of ancient mystery and high-end technology, giving readers a very rich and unique reading pleasure. However, it is obviously very difficult for the film to express these details as pictures, and it is even more difficult for Downer, who is used to shooting "Superman" and other big scenes but is not good at details, and finally causes a rough feeling. It's inevitable
.
The film is not worth watching. First of all, the theme of "time travel" has completely become synonymous with "bad vulgarity". Instead of trying to get something fresh, the film further reduces "time travel" to the point where it is not as good as a child's play. Those time machines built with cheap glass slices can't convey any high-tech seriousness except to save production costs. Secondly, even when watching a single scene, it was a mess by the director. Several actors are always arguing on the screen forever, I won’t say how annoying it is, how annoying it is; even if it is a spectacular war scene, it is obnoxious by the messy scene scheduling and lack of inspirational cameras. There was no such momentum as the famous battle in the Hundred Years' War between Britain and France, especially when the castle was broken, the men on both sides seemed to die suddenly, and there were only a few figures left in the deserted place
.
