Computer rendering accurately captures the movements and expressions of various animals, and mastering many details looks more lifelike, which is close to the reality of the wild ecological documentary. The scene in the film is even more amazing. The Glory Rock where the Lion King’s family lives is real and feels bigger. Surrounded by the African savannah, there are a variety of rich flora and fauna, as well as the day and night changes in the sky, which are vivid as if they were personally experienced. Its environment.
Sometimes, the picture looks too good, and your brain is engaged in a fierce ideological struggle-why they don't do a good job anymore (in our memory, the Glory Stone is in the valley). Other times, animals are limited by simulation technology; forget the original "Busby Berkeley" choreography or the unbridled expressionism of "Hakuna Matata", because this time, all the surreal animals can do is just Walking around in a monotonous environment, fighting with each other. (Don’t ask why Shazu the hornbill can speak Queen English—even if his beak can only move up and down.
The film is an amazing technical achievement, but even if it is so detailed, it is only "realistic" because real animals can't speak, they can't sing, and they won't quote those interesting pop culture stalks. Movies are sometimes wonderful, but they are often ridiculous. And sometimes — like a very lifelike animal dying on the big screen in front of you, and the only son wailing for him — really wandering on the edge of the grotesque.
