The Great Debaters evaluation action

2021-12-26 08:01
The response of "The Great Debaters" was mediocre. Many people think it is not as good as Denzel Hayes Washington Jr.'s directorial debut "Anthony Fisher". Although Denzel's director skills have become more skilled, the overall level of the film is not as good. A leap forward. The film is a very ambitious work. Whether it is the passionate speech of Frist Whitaker in the opening, or the solemn and solemn scenes and soundtrack at the end, it shows that the director wants to make it into an excellent work.
The film has no problems with plot handling and rhythm control. As a two-hour feature film, it does not appear to be lengthy. Denzel Hayes Washington Jr. cleverly incorporates many conflicting elements such as love, race, family, and team in the play. The external environment intertwined with many contradictions set off the hard-won success of the debate team. However, the characterization of the film is somewhat lacking. Everyone seems to be the protagonist, but it creates a situation where the priority is unknown, showing that the director is focusing on the story, not the character. The role is entirely at the service of the plot, but the director ignores the complete shaping of the role. The special identity of James Farmer II created many conflicting points for the film. The emotional line between James and his father was also handled well in the film, showing the strong narrative skills of Denzel Hayes Washington Jr.   .
<< Foxtrot evaluation action The Great Debaters movie plot >>
Extended Reading
  • Ken 2022-03-27 09:01:12

    2012.10.03 racial issues nice

  • Kenton 2022-04-24 07:01:15

    great man with black skin

The Great Debaters quotes

  • James Farmer Jr.: We do what we have to do in order to do what we want to do.

  • James Farmer Jr.: In Texas they lynch Negroes. My teammates and I saw a man strung up by his neck and set on fire. We drove through a lynch mob, pressed our faces against the floorboard. I looked at my teammates. I saw the fear in their eyes and, worse, the shame. What was this Negro's crime that he should be hung without trial in a dark forest filled with fog. Was he a thief? Was he a killer? Or just a Negro? Was he a sharecropper? A preacher? Were his children waiting up for him? And who are we to just lie there and do nothing. No matter what he did, the mob was the criminal. But the law did nothing. Just left us wondering, "Why?" My opponent says nothing that erodes the rule of law can be moral. But there is no rule of law in the Jim Crow south. Not when Negroes are denied housing. Turned away from schools, hospitals. And not when we are lynched. St Augustine said, "An unjust law in no law at all.' Which means I have a right, even a duty to resist. With violence or civil disobedience. You should pray I choose the latter.

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Dogesflix's opinion. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 workdays after receiving your email. If you find any instances of plagiarism from our website, please send an email to: info-contact@dogesflix.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 2 working days.

More Articles

Recommend Articles