Spiderman is actually a very pleasing character. Peter Parker is neither a born super hero (Superman) nor a billionaire dude (Batman, Iron Man). The closest his bloodline is actually the Hulk. Before the film was released, the producer said that this version of Peter will be transformed into "the most fashionable and interesting Spider-Man yet", and the new heroine played by the young Emma Stone will be more interesting. I thought at the time that Andrew Garfield would use this movie to prove that he is an actor with both idol and strength, and director Mark Webber can do this.
Sadly, "The Amazing Spider-Man" eventually became a problematic movie: First, in an era when superheroes have been overconsumed, and even Spider-Man has been overconsumed, the birth of this film is a bit untimely; The second sticking point is that "The Amazing Spider-Man" does not really provide innovative power, especially since it repeats the old version of the story, which is simply incredible. The third problem is that the film lacks a complete and eye-catching villain, a villain with a character like the little green devil, and the audience is very welcome. Didn't James Franco make it famous? But the lizardman in this film is unlikely to impress people, at best it is equal to the sandman in "Spider-Man 3". "The Amazing Spider-Man" is a very "safe" movie, but in this era of continuous development of genre depth in Hollywood, it is obviously outdated. Compared with the adventurous "Dark Knight Rises", "The Amazing Spider-Man" is very Will soon be forgotten by the audience.
