Taste of Cherry movie plot
-
Eryn 2022-03-24 09:03:37
Abbas is the master of real time, looking at the bland but the sound creates a textured rhythm for us, we look at the characters in parallel in this time, all the information no longer seems to belong to the protagonist, but it seems to be more It is a film about the land. Varda once told the monstrous loess drama in the CC disc selection. At the same time, he thought that we will all return to the land. Who can not be moved by this scene? At the end, think about the last scene of "24 Frames",
-
Johathan 2022-03-28 09:01:12
6.0/10 There are too many lectures, too few images, and the highlight moments are indeed full of "miracles", but they are too rare, forcing the audience to endure more than three quarters of an hour in the car's driver's seat - the front and rear of the passenger seat, and the outside of the window. Overexposure completely obscures the possible representation of the landscape. The urban construction in the distant view and the grassland under the sunlight in the close view have indeed achieved a coexistence of pastoral and industrial appearances, full of aftertaste, but after the lecturers who got on and off one after another, this could have been a more tragic and epic fate. The dignified or dignified landform has been reduced to a kind of "scenery" that is consumed by people and used to move themselves like "cherries", and is flattened. The script has no sense of structure at all, showing a one-way drag, which may overlap with the creator's intention. This layer of preaching is too obvious. If the male protagonist only uses his own observation of the surrounding (the camera is indeed always aimed at the male) The Lord’s Watching Act) to the final open ending will leave the audience feeling free as well. Too many images are only described in words and not shown: the whole picture of the pit by the tree, the dissection of quails, the appearance of the city, etc. Only the metaphor of war fits the bill.
-
Mr. Bagheri: Some things are easier to do than to say.
-
Mr. Badii: I've decided to free myself from this life.
The seminarian: What for?
Mr. Badii: It wouldn't help you to know and I can't talk about it and you wouldn't understand. It's not because you don't understand but you can't feel what I feel. You can sympathize, understand, show compassion. But feel my pain? No. You suffer and so do I. I understand you. You comprehend my pain, but you can't feel it