"King Arthur" is known as "epic" and emphasizes "shock". It is an exaggeration to say that this play is "epic". The unreasonable plot of the movie and the thinness of the characters make this movie unable to compare with a truly epic masterpiece like "Brave Heart". The title of the film is "King Arthur". In fact, it only talks about the confrontation between Arthur and a small group of Saxons landing troops. The time span is no more than one month. The undefeated legend and great achievements of King Arthur are only conveyed by a few narrations. The characterization of King Arthur was also a failure. Apart from being handsome, he often appeared a few poetic long dialogues, but there was nothing special about it at all. Although he also called "FightForFreedom", but the appeal is not comparable to Mel Gibson in "Brave Heart". The most fundamental reason is that the plot is not in place. There are too few descriptions of how the legendary Arthur grew up and how to adhere to his ideals, and the audience has no sympathy. The protagonist's vague personality makes the supporting roles more colorful, like the reckless Bowes, the romantic Lancelot, and the reticent Dagonnet. ()
For the movie itself, it is not just an action movie, but an epic masterpiece that once again brought myths to the big screen after "Gladiator" and "Troy". If the audience can accept this film, it will redefine the legend of King Arthur and unveil its mystery for the audience and the next generation. But if most people cannot accept it, they will be more inclined to the mysterious and obscure. Britain’s greatest legend, then this film is bound to fail
