Judgment at Nuremberg movie plot

2021-12-30 17:21
Nuremberg was originally a low-profile city in eastern Germany, but an unprecedented trial in 1945 made Nuremberg famous. In order to implement the court regulations on prosecution and punishment of August 8, 1945 and the court regulations attached to the agreement, on November 20, 1945, the justices of Russia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France entered the 600th courtroom of the German Nuremberg Court. The first International Court of Justice in the eye-catching history, the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal, opened here.
By Jordan Spence . Tracy, Richard. The film co-starred by Widmark and others is a star drama. Tells about the legal relationship of the German Nazi plan in Nuremberg after World War II. The reason for the arraignment of the three defendants was to perform seed-breaking operations on the Jews. The presiding judge was the American Herut, who claimed that two of the defendants were not guilty; while the German Attorney General Yalink kept silent on the matter, but the prosecutor Colonel Rosen fiercely accused the defendants, so the three people Have a heated debate. The interrogation continued. The senior officials in the United States hoped to get a good proof of the crime committed by Germany in the trial, so they put great pressure on the trial, but Groot insisted on the justice of the law and gave the most fair judgment. When announcing the verdict, only Yalin expressed his appreciation for the attitude of the Chief Judge Herut. This film is a socialist producer Stanley. Kremer put the memoirs of the Presiding Judge Herut on the screen and filmed them, using outstanding acting skills to show the entangled relationship between ethics and ethics. The film won the Best Actor Award and Best Adapted Screenplay Award.
In very difficult circumstances, the Nuremberg Trials lasted 315 days and held 218 court sessions. Justice and evil once again fought fiercely in different forms. All parties in the trial provided 2,630 testimonies, 240 witnesses appeared in court to testify, and 300,000 sworn certificates.
<< Foxtrot evaluation action The Sweet Life evaluation action >>
Extended Reading
  • Hipolito 2022-03-28 09:01:04

    I like the ingenious way that the film uses a glimpse to see the whole thing. Although the selected subject matter is not the real trial of the century, its torture of human nature and war is no less than the real Nuremberg trial. The group play is wonderful.

  • Jessyca 2022-03-25 09:01:10

    Un grand classique marqué par les prestations sublimes livrées par ces acteurs et le dilemme entre le patriotisme et la conscience morale.

Judgment at Nuremberg quotes

  • Emil Hahn: Germany was fighting for its life. Certain measures were needed to protect it from its enemies. I cannot say that I am sorry we applied those measures. We were a bulwark against Bolshevism. We were a pillar of Western culture. A bulwark and a pillar the West may yet wish to retain.

  • Judge Dan Haywood: Curtiss, you were saying that the men are not responsible for their acts. You're going to have to explain that to me. You're going to have to explain it very carefully.

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Dogesflix's opinion. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 workdays after receiving your email. If you find any instances of plagiarism from our website, please send an email to: info-contact@dogesflix.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 2 working days.

Recommend Articles