"Assassination of Kennedy" should be a familiar movie to the majority of movie fans. The film is more than 3 hours long, with many characters and clues. However, under the command of Oliver Stone, it is methodical and it is based on the type of suspense reasoning film. Transform this political movie (that is, political thriller), which might have been boring, to make the audience feel that 3 hours is not long at all.
The film is gorgeous and the editing is superb. It's no exaggeration. The biggest controversy caused by the film is the conspiracy theory and Oliver Stone's way of telling the story. The film is composed of factual information, film reconstruction fragments, descriptive footage during the reasoning, and reproduction of the film itself. It alternates between black and white and color. Some people commented that the reasoning fragments are black and white, but this is not the case. In the reasoning scene, these are actually all Disordered.
The film is best known for Kevin Costner's more than 30-minute speech in the final court climax scene. Because Oliver Stone roughly used three camera positions to create three different viewing mental states for the audience: the present, the judge, and the conspirator. This is actually a declaration of the American spirit. From Kevin's point of view, he was particularly upright and awe-inspiring. Watching this film is absolutely shocking, not only because it is a work of both elegance and popular appreciation, but also because the film conveyed and exposed is worthy of all Chinese people to think about their own environment.
"Assassination of Kennedy" is extremely watchable and fascinating. Putting aside all those plots and emotions, just the integration of the various elements of the film can tell that it is a masterpiece. Scripts, editing, music, photography, etc., are all well used in this extremely complex movie. From the evidence and testimony piled up as high as a mountain, Stone woven a convincing and expansive picture. In the years to come, the students of the film school will study it with consternation, astonished by the amount of information it contains, the wide range of characters, the number of interrelated flashbacks, and the close interweaving of real material and fictional scenes. For a full one hundred and eighty-eight minutes, the film is advancing rapidly in an ocean full of information and speculation. It has not slowed down for a moment, and it has never confused us
