"007 vs. Casino Royale" hardly has any regrets. This is all you can expect from a 007 movie, even if it exceeds your expectations and is worth it, the movie has done it. In addition to the breathtaking action scenes and the perfect Daniel Craig, the script accurately grasps the concise, sharp, and cruel style of Fleming's original novel. ()
Following the success of "Golden Eye" in 1995, director Martin Campbell once again pushed the Bond series to a whole new level. As for the controversial Daniel Craig, his charismatic performance is enough to erase Pierce. · Brosnan, Roger Moore, and even Sean Connery left shadows in the hearts of movie fans. ()
Daniel Craig was a great Bond. He was the first actor who could perfectly grasp the temperament of Fleming’s original works: a charming man, a cruel and ruthless patriot, a killing machine with outstanding professional quality, and Have a noble taste for luxury goods-Daniel Craig's performance is almost Bond's precise definition. Under his demonstration, director Martin Campbell’s performance is also exceptional. The climax of the action scenes are set to be breathtaking. In addition, the film also has an unparalleled thriller atmosphere, and the lines are full of black humor. This is a movie. A 007 movie that combines the styles of "The Bourne" and "Old School". ()
There is no doubt that "007 vs. Casino Royale" is the best 007 movie in the ten years since "Golden Eye", and it is so groundbreaking compared to its predecessors. Daniel Craig's strong muscles, sharp eyes and powerful skills The predecessor Bond was extremely weak, and Brosnan's gentle gentleman temperament was completely replaced by his coldness and determination. The tone of the film was dark and cruel, and the violence index was completely beyond imagination. ()
