Waltz’s performance directly made Adams uncomfortable, and this is to be blamed on the film, because Adams’s role is a character that has no fun and shows itself. The film gradually became lifeless and lifeless, which is exactly the same as Big Eyes's illustrationsreviewed. Bolton fainted one after another, leaving his film in a situation where he couldn't get better. It neither made people laugh, nor thought provoking. This film about women's awakening, resistance, success and inspiration did not meet the audience's expectations. Judging from the final result of the film, "Big Eyes" cannot be convinced in terms of authenticity, and there is no complete chain of emotions. Therefore, the film is not convincing
Big Eyes negative reviews
2021-12-16 08:01
Extended Reading
-
Humberto 2021-12-16 08:01:10
There is no Helena, this is unscientific!
-
Shaina 2022-04-22 07:01:31
Bolton played the dark wind of the small fresh department. Waltz is very powerful, and when his ability is reached, the play path will naturally become wider and wider, and he is much stronger than a certain queen.
-
Hipster Lady: I think it's creepy, maudlin and amateurish.
Hipster Man: Exactly. I love it.
-
Walter Keane: What are you afraid of! Just because people like my work, that means automatically it's bad?
John Canaday: No, but it doesn't make it art either. Art should elevate, not pander. Particularly in a Hall of Education.
Walter Keane: You have no idea! Why does someone become a critic? Because he cannot create!
John Canaday: Oh, dear. That moldy chestnut.
Walter Keane: Don't interrupt! You don't know what it's like to put your emotions out there, naked for the whole world to see!
John Canaday: What emotions? It's synthetic hack work. Your masterpiece has an infinity of Keanes, which makes it an infinity of kitsch.