In the film, the space between Batman and Superman is too small. I’m sorry for the title of "Batman vs. Superman." The so-called battle is more in the form of an inner drama in which two people are provoked by the wicked and displease each other in the air. The film’s logical weakness is beyond negligible. The director and screenwriter used nearly two-thirds of the space to portray the opposition between Batman and Superman. In the long foreshadowing, there has never been a tenable reason. Everything is Relying on Bruce Wayne's nightmares to advance the plot development, this writing technique is somewhat amateurish. The last second will kill you, and the next second you will become a brother to your heart. I can't imagine how the screenwriter came up with such a contradiction in the moment of life and death, so that the audience would be a stalk.
The film's serious narrative, dark vision, complex and trivial story, big scenes and bloody violence, for DC, who aims to get out of a completely different style from Marvel, the guide on the book is a good choice. And after Nolan proved that serious narratives can be seamlessly docked with superheroes, Zach Schneider did inject these distinctive labels of his own into the DC universe, from Superman, Batman to Wonder Woman, who are all focused on dark colors. They all lack a sense of humor. They talk about the feelings of family and country, and continue to explore the serious themes of how superpowers should be restrained, as well as visual scenes full of various large-scale destruction. In the overall control of the film, Zach Schneider also used too much clumsiness. The character setting of mutual generation and mutual restraint tried to inject seriousness but ultimately failed to synthesize. A large number of dream insertions and jumping editing failed to make the characters stand up. Living is more trivial, continuing the dazzling bombardment effects of "Superman: Man of Steel" and it is about to turn from aesthetic fatigue to visual garbage.
"Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" put so many events and so many characters into the pot, so a good story was turned into a pot of northeast chaos. Two idioms can be used to describe this short-sighted and mentally retarded behavior.
The first part of the film is trivial and long, with a slow pace, and the plot itself does not advance, which makes people feel dull and boring. Although it took a lot of time to lay the groundwork, the characterization of Batman and Superman was not enough. Fortunately, some points were collected in the subsequent battle. Director Zach Schneider is good at long shots and slow motions. There are not many performances in the film but it is very colorful and gives a strong sense of ritual.
The film may be spectacular, but it is not entertaining. The villain Luther played by Jesse Eisenberg is so annoying that you want Batman and Superman to join forces to kill him. Ben Affleck plays the bat. The man is not mature enough. Although Henry Cavill's Superman is likable, the long-term restrictions on his abilities are puzzling.
For many fans of American comics, "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" is a superhero blockbuster not to be missed, but this film is not at all popular with fans. There is too much content in the film, the plot is confusing, and Eisenberg's exaggerated acting skills are a major reduction.
It is not easy to present a serious and sentimental emotion throughout the process, and the emotional enhancement is achieved through the intermittent sentimental lines between various explosion scenes, which is obviously not realistic. For such a film that focuses on the inner activities of the characters, this way of emotional presentation is inherently incoherent. In contrast, you may prefer the more relaxed way in the Marvel superhero movie.
"Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" has a few wonderful moments that make the whole film worthwhile, and the new Batman introduced in this film is also quite interesting. However, the plot of the whole film is messy, there are many loopholes in the plot, and some of the jokes in the film are also very awkward.
The film is more pessimistic than "Anti-Christian". The Superman played by Henry Cavill is called the most narcissistic superman in history. He often seems too complacent. In this movie called "Batman v Superman", it is Wonder Woman pushed the climax several times. After watching the movie for an hour, one might wonder if it's time to watch Wonder Woman movie.
Director Zach Schneider spliced many grand scenes together, which may be enough to satisfy fans, but these scenes did not form a whole, and the biggest battle in history was only 20 minutes. , Jesse Eisenberg is still good, the villain he plays brings demonic entertainment.
