Man is a tragic existence. The brave and eloquent Emperor Xiongnu, and the ingenious ancient Rome commander are all great people who shake the world and cry . But there is such a dead spot, one is that the heroes are sad at the Beauty Pass, and the other is the foolish loyalty of unknown origin. They click each other and die in the end. The so-called causal karma is the so-called non-attachment.
Although the male number one is Emperor Xiongnu, the one who really shines is the commander-in-chief of Ancient Rome. The personality and destiny of Emperor Xiongnu are simple and straightforward, and the self-construction of innate theocracy adds bravery and strategy, which is clear at a glance. The commander of Ancient Rome is much more treacherous. Such a clever and witty person manipulates the destiny of many nations and nations, but cannot clearly examine the motivation and purpose of his actions. He was captured by a huge blind loyalty, and I don't think he would fail to recognize his hostile and necessary interaction with Emperor Xiongnu. The moment he was stabbed to death in the palace hall of Ancient Rome, he must have already foreseen it. However, this is his wish. It is also his persistence, his "Achilles" heel, which originated from the ancient Rome empire he loves deeply, which is powerful or he fantasizes about its powerful "father". "Oedipus complex" "fear of castration"? If the film explains his growth background, experience, etc., this character will definitely be richer and more three-dimensional and more thought-provoking.
In short, the film is very "good-looking", but it is because of this that it is a bit simple and simple, and the romance is excessive. Except for the visual differences in clothing, food and accommodation, the Xiongnu people seem to have no essential difference with the Ancient Rome people. However, this is definitely impossible. The Xiongnu people and the Ancient Rome people, the barbaric tribes and the civilized society, must have faced a spiritual conflict between the violent integration and collision of thinking styles, life conventions, value orientations, social structures and so on. And it's not just that the Emperor Xiongnu would raise the sword he had somehow digged up to the sky and scream, while the Commander of Ancient Rome would not. Check out how fascinating it is. Why was it that it was not the Xiongnu people but the Visigoths who destroyed the Western Ancient Rome Empire? It’s a pity that "the past is unavailable." The past can never be restored. It's just that in the process of constant attempts, countless more or less romances have created countless new Emperor Xiongnu and a new history of the decline of Ancient Rome. They Gathering together, let this mystery shine more and more moving.
