Apocalypse Now Shooting Highlights
-
Clarissa 2022-03-25 09:01:02
When Kurtz appears on the screen as a real person, is the film rebuilding the history of the Vietnam War and even the legitimacy of human civilization? In the process of approaching Kurtz, Willard reshaped Kurtz's meaning to himself in the form of words. Is this the establishment of a belief or an imagination of temptation? In the end, Kurtz was executed by a passivated human weapon. The fall of the "god" is the same as the birth. Does the absence of the picture lead us to believe in another "spectacle" that cannot be presented? Does the nihility revealed by the dissolving lens that constantly appear in the movie belong to the same kind of "nihility" described by US military officers? How does this vast rainforest compliment the mutual imagination of the East and the West at that time and now? When watching this movie, can the audience withstand the reverse stare of the character? Where should the answer be found?
-
Lucinda 2021-10-20 18:58:46
Coppola: "The Godfather" adopts a classical style. Each shot is like a brick in the overall structure of the scene, and the scene becomes a beautiful brick wall design. Gordon Willis believes that a shot should not be all-encompassing , Otherwise there is no reason to switch to another lens. On the other hand, in "Apocalypse Now", Vittorio Storaro expects the lens to be like a moving penholder, sliding from an image element to an element. In the end I turned to Sophia Explain to myself, the lens can be like a word (the former)...but it can also be like a sentence (the latter).” ("Future Movie")
-
Willard: It's a way we had over here for living with ourselves. We cut 'em in half with a machine gun and give 'em a Band-Aid. It was a lie. And the more I saw them, the more I hated lies.
-
Lance: Disneyland? Fuck, man, this is better than Disneyland!