A History of Violence behind the scenes gags

2022-01-25 08:05

The location of Rich Cusack's residence in the film is from a fake French castle outside Toronto.
When filming the sex scene on the stairs, the actor did not use the special effect pad, so in the later naked shots on the bed, Edie's back showed signs of bruising and had to be covered by a makeup artist.
The scene where Tom killed two robbers in a restaurant was later cut out. In the original version, the young robber was shot seven times in the body, while the older robber was shot twice in the head. Cronenberg believes This scene was a bit too much, there was a suspicion of promoting violence, so it was deleted.
Thomas Jane and Harrison Ford both refused to play Tom in the film.
The scenes in the restaurant were all filmed in the studio, and the crew built a street view outside the window.
In order to develop a Philadelphia accent, Vigo Mortensen, who plays Tom, asks Maria Bello's uncle and brother for advice.
Some of the props in the restaurant and Stewart’s house were purchased by Vigo Mortensen.
When the protagonist drove to Philadelphia, a Canadian speed limit sign appeared on the highway.

<< Foxtrot evaluation action A History of Violence movie plot >>

Extended Reading

A History of Violence short comments

Shanna 2022-04-22 07:01:05

A. Especially cleverly directed after "Spider Nightmare", the subconscious leads "Capgra paranoia" to deepen the suspense, but it is amazing that the original villain was killed more than halfway through the plot, followed by the psychological truth (the past, history). Cronenberg seems to be telling us that violence is innate just like desire. The overreaction of the family is more like Cronenberg's style. It does not refer to the curious and advanced imagination, but there is always an unreasonable plot logic. For example, "Unforgiven" returned to the farmland and returned to the rivers and lakes, breaking the so-called American dream with violence and violence. The last stare is also the best way to end it. I especially like the interlocking design of this kind of characters: robber (the long mirror at the beginning: the technique is lame and inhuman) → Bobby (the ignorant and bold, but the former is weak) → the son (the violent control of the father Cognitive change), and thus found that the whole film is simple, rude and unnecessary.
Shanna 2022-04-23 07:01:31

The story is alright, but the performance of the male pig's feet is relatively underwhelming. Violent scenes don't feel as tense as Quentin and the Coen brothers.